|
Confirmed Education Review Marist Primary School (Mt Albert) May 2010 |
|
Disclaimer Individual ERO school and early childhood services reports are public information and may be copied or sent electronically. However, the Education Review Office can guarantee only the authenticity of original documents which have been obtained in hard copy
directly from either the local ERO office or ERO Corporate Office in Wellington. Please consult your telephone book, or see
the ERO web page, http://www.ero.govt.nz, for ERO office addresses.
|
1 The Education Review Office (ERO) Evaluation.................................................. 1
2 Marist
Primary School (Mt Albert)’s Curriculum.................................................... 1
3 Board Assurance on Legal
Requirements............................................................ 1
4 Future Action.........................................................................................................1
About The School........................................................................................................... 1
To the Parents and Community
General Information about Reviews
Confirmed Education Review Report:
Marist Primary School (Mt Albert)
This report has been prepared in accordance with standard procedures approved by the Chief Review Officer.
The 2007 ERO report noted that students were enthusiastic, purposeful, and proud of their school. These positive attributes continue to be evident. Students enjoy the wide variety of interesting learning experiences they are offered. They talk confidently about their learning and participate actively in a relevant and meaningful curriculum. Students make good progress within each year and as they move through the year levels. Teachers make very good use of achievement data to design programmes. School information about students’ achievement in reading, writing and mathematics shows that a significant majority of students achieve very well. Appropriate learning support programmes are in place to help all students to enjoy success.
Teachers are effective classroom practitioners. They have benefited from in-depth, school-wide professional learning and development on teaching writing and numeracy skills. Teachers frequently engage in professional discussion about student progress and achievement and effective teaching practices. They reflect on and evaluate their practices so that they can continue to respond accurately to students’ learning needs. They critique each others’ professional practices to ensure that the good teaching practices currently in place are sustained and further improved.
Senior managers work collaboratively
and provide staff with strong professional leadership in curriculum development. The senior management team has established
strong relationships with students, staff, trustees, parents and the community and parish.
The board of trustees provides the school with sound governance. The board is focused on students and ensures that they have the resources and facilities they need to achieve in a broad curriculum. Trustees receive regular information about student achievement and the achievement of different groups of students. They are well informed about all aspects of the school. They bring expertise and knowledge to their roles and undertake relevant training. Good succession planning is likely to ensure that effective governance systems currently in place will continue to operate for the benefit of students.
Parents are supportive of the school and value opportunities to be involved in school activities, events and classroom programmes. The school benefits from the generous contributions to school resourcing from an active and supportive Parent Teacher and Friends Association (PTFA).
Trustees agree with the ERO that the
next steps for the board and staff are to continue to consider Ka Hikitia, and the Pasifika Education Plan, the Ministry of Education’s
strategies to improve the achievement of Maori and Pacific students. Other agreed priorities are for teachers to continue to
focus on developing the school’s own curriculum, and to share assessment data more fully with students to acknowledge their progress
and achievement.
The board of trustees has demonstrated that it is governing the school in the interest of the
students and the Crown. The board, together with the principal and school leaders, continues to be highly effective in using
self-review procedures to further promote student learning: engagement, progress and achievement. ERO is likely to carry out
the next review in four to five years.
How effectively does the curriculum of Marist Primary School (Mt Albert) promote student learning: engagement, progress and achievement?
School context and self review
Well developed self-review processes mean that
the school is on a path of continuous improvement. Students are provided with a broad curriculum that is underpinned by the
Catholic character of the school. High priority is placed on the key curriculum areas of numeracy, literacy and religious education. Curriculum contexts are relevant and meaningful for students.
Teachers are effective practitioners. They have benefited from participation in school-wide professional development on the teaching of writing and numeracy, and document and implement programmes that are well differentiated to meet the needs of individuals and groups of students. They are increasingly transferring the effective teaching strategies they have learned in reading, writing and numeracy to their teaching in all curriculum areas. They reflect on and evaluate their practices so that they can continue to respond accurately to students’ learning needs.
Areas of strength
Student engagement. Students are highly engaged in learning experiences. They actively participate in the wide variety of interesting and enjoyable learning experiences offered to them. Students talk confidently about their learning and progress, are motivated to learn, and are positive about the opportunities provided for them.
Leadership. Senior managers provide teachers with strong professional and educational leadership. They have a very good overview of student progress and achievement and use this knowledge effectively to make decisions about interventions, support programmes, curriculum development and resourcing. They ensure that professional learning and development is manageable for teachers and that effective practices for teaching and learning are used in all classrooms.
Monitoring student progress. Teachers use reliable, norm-referenced assessment tools to assess students’ skills in reading, writing and mathematics. Assessment data are regularly collated, analysed and used to guide further improvements in student learning, and in resourcing, and reporting to parents, the board and the school community. Senior managers use assessment data to track and monitor student achievement over time and to identify trends and patterns in the achievement of specific groups of students.
Student achievement. School data show an upward trend in student achievement over the last three years. Information about student achievement in reading, writing and mathematics shows that a significant majority of students achieve at levels that are at and above national age-related expectations. On entry to school, students have good levels of early knowledge about literacy and numeracy. Data analyses show the further gains that students make in learning literacy skills in their first year at school. Students make good progress within each year and as they move through the year levels. Senior managers and teachers have appropriate strategies for supporting students who are underachieving.
Assessment data are analysed separately for Maori and Pacific students and for other specific groups of students. The numbers of both Maori and Pacific students are small, but school data show that almost all Maori and Pacific students achieve at and above national levels of achievement in reading vocabulary and comprehension. In mathematics, most Maori and Pacific students in Years 4 to 6 achieve at and above nationally expected levels of achievement.
Reporting student achievement. Senior managers have identified, and ERO agrees, that teachers could now review systems for reporting to parents to ensure that they use plain language to report against the national standards. Senior managers are also keen to explore ways in which teachers can share levels of achievement with their students to enhance their current good knowledge of their own progress, and to help them to identify their next steps in learning.
Areas for development and review
Further development of The New Zealand Curriculum. Senior managers and teachers are looking forward to ongoing development work on the New Zealand Curriculum in the context of this school.
Maori and Pacific student achievement. Trustees agree with the ERO that the next steps for the board and staff are to continue to consider Ka Hikitia, and the Pasifika Education Plan, the Ministry of Education’s strategies to improve the achievement of Maori and Pacific students. The challenge is to ensure that Maori and Pacific students continue to achieve well in a culturally responsive context.
Review provision for gifted and talented students. Students respond positively to teachers’ high expectations. Trustees, senior managers and staff could consider how best to identify and provide additional challenge for gifted and talented students.
Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of Marist Primary School (Mt Albert) completed an EROBoard Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
· board administration;
· curriculum;
· management of health, safety and welfare;
· personnel management;
· financial management; and
· asset management.
During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on students’ achievement:
· emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment);
· physical safety of students;
· teacher registration;
· stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions; and
· attendance.
ERO’s investigations during the course of the review did not identify any areas of concern.
The board of trustees has demonstrated that it is governing the school in the interest of the students and the Crown. The board, together with the principal and school leaders, continues to be highly effective in using self review procedures to further
promote student learning: engagement, progress and achievement. ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four to five years.
Richard Thornton
National Manager Review Services
Northern Region
3 May 2010
|
School type |
Contributing Primary (Years 1-6) |
|
Decile[1] |
7 |
|
School
roll |
262 |
|
Gender composition |
Boys 51%, Girls 49% |
|
Ethnic composition |
New Zealand European/Pakeha 56%, Maori 9%, |
|
Review team on site |
March 2010 |
|
Date of this report |
3 May 2010 |
|
Previous three ERO reports |
Education
Review, May 2007 |
3 May 2010
To the Parents and
Community of Marist Primary School (Mt Albert)
These are the findings of the Education Review Office’s latest report on
Marist Primary
School (Mt Albert).
The 2007 ERO report noted that students were enthusiastic, purposeful, and proud of their school. These positive attributes continue to be evident. Students enjoy the wide variety of interesting learning experiences they are offered. They talk confidently about their learning and participate actively in a relevant and meaningful curriculum. Students make good progress within each year and as they move through the year levels. Teachers make very good use of achievement data to design programmes. School information about students’ achievement in reading, writing and mathematics shows that a significant majority of students achieve very well. Appropriate learning support programmes are in place to help all students to enjoy success.
Teachers are effective classroom practitioners. They have benefited from in-depth, school-wide professional learning and development on teaching writing and numeracy skills. Teachers frequently engage in professional discussion about student progress and achievement and effective teaching practices. They reflect on and evaluate their practices so that they can continue to respond accurately to students’ learning needs. They critique each others’ professional practices to ensure that the good teaching practices currently in place are sustained and further improved.
Senior managers work collaboratively and provide staff with strong professional
leadership in curriculum development. The senior management team has established strong relationships with students, staff,
trustees, parents and the community and parish.
The board of trustees provides the school with sound governance. The board is focused on students and ensures that they have the resources and facilities they need to achieve in a broad curriculum. Trustees receive regular information about student achievement and the achievement of different groups of students. They are well informed about all aspects of the school. They bring expertise and knowledge to their roles and undertake relevant training. Good succession planning is likely to ensure that effective governance systems currently in place will continue to operate for the benefit of students.
Parents are supportive of the school and value opportunities to be involved in school activities, events and classroom programmes. The school benefits from the generous contributions to school resourcing from an active and supportive Parent Teacher and Friends Association (PTFA).
Trustees agree with the ERO that the next steps for the board and staff are to continue to considerKa Hikitia, and the Pasifika Education Plan, the Ministry of Education’s strategies to improve the achievement of Maori and Pacific
students. Other agreed priorities are for teachers to continue to focus on developing the school’s own curriculum, and to share
assessment data more fully with students to acknowledge their progress and achievement.
Future Action
The board of trustees has
demonstrated that it is governing the school in the interest of the students and the Crown. The board, together with the principal
and school leaders, continues to be highly effective in using self-review procedures to further promote student learning: engagement,
progress and achievement. ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four to five years.
Review Coverage
This report provides
an evaluation of how effectively the school’s curriculum promotes student learning - engagement, progress and achievement. ERO’s
evaluation takes account of the school’s previous reporting history and is based on:
· what is known about student achievement information, including the achievement of Maori and Pacific students;
· decisions made to improve student achievement using assessment and self-review information; and
· teaching strategies and programmes implemented to give effect to the school’s curriculum.
ERO also gathers information during the review
to contribute to its national reports. The national reports are published on ERO’s website.
If you would like a copy of the full report, please contact the school or see the ERO website, www.ero.govt.nz.
Richard Thornton
National Manager Review Services
Northern Region
General Information about Reviews
About ERO
ERO is an independent, external evaluation agency that undertakes
reviews of schools and early childhood services throughout
About ERO Reviews
ERO follows a set of standard procedures to
conduct reviews. The purpose of each review is to:
improve educational achievement in schools; and
provide information to parents,
communities and the government.
Reviews are intended to focus on student achievement and build on each school’s self review.
Review
Focus
ERO’s framework for reviewing and reporting integrates the following:
school curriculum;
national evaluation topics –contribute
to the development of education policies and their effective implementation; and
Board Assurance Statement, including student and staff
health and safety.
ERO’s review is responsive to the school’s context. When ERO reviews a school, it takes into account the characteristics of the community from which it draws its students, its aspirations for its young people, and other relevant local factors.
ERO also builds on the school’s own self-review information. ERO is interested in how a school monitors the progress
of its students and aspects of school life and culture, and how it uses this information to improve student learning.
This helps ERO to answer the major evaluation question for reviews:
How effectively does this school's curriculum promote student learning - engagement, progress and achievement?
Areas for Development and Review
ERO reports include areas for development
and review to support on-going improvement by identifying priorities. Often the school will have identified these matters through
its own self review and already plans further development in those areas.
[1] School deciles range from one to ten. Decile one schools draw their students from low socio-economic communities and at the other end of the range, decile 10 schools draw their students from high socio-economic communities. Deciles are used to provide funding to state and state integrated schools. The lower the school’s decile the more funding it receives. A school’s decile is in no way linked to the quality of education it provides.